|
|
Enron Mail |
Dan,
Per my earlier conversation here are the details. The original contracts are 078-27105-302 (NGMS & Entex) and 058-27105-301 (HPLC Mktg & Entex) . The NGMS contract in Section 8 allows 1 year to recover volume changes and the HPLC Mktg contract in Section 8 allows 2 years to recover volume changes. Per our conversation today, the contract provisions override the state law and Entex should not be invoiced the additional volumes. Janet, since we cannot rebill Entex do you still want us to reallocate and then write off the dollar amounts. This would enable us to be in sync from a physical volume side. Please let me know. HC ---------------------- Forwarded by Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2000 01:22 PM --------------------------- Janet H Wallis 02/17/2000 09:17 AM To: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joanie H Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Entex 1997 Howard, I believe the contract reads that we have up to 2 years to re-invoice so could you explain the 4 year Statute of Limitations. I am not familiar with it and if we do have a legal right that overrides the contract then we should explore this option. Also, what is the standard operation procedure? Are we reconciling the entire system and re-invoicing everyone whether it is for or against the pipeline? Janet Howard B Camp 02/17/2000 08:48 AM To: Janet H Wallis/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thu Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle R Lilly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joanie H Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Entex 1997 Janet, Here is short note to update you on the questions you had on 1997. This came about due to a project that Volume Management is working on for Brenda Herrod in reconciling the 1996-1998 Unaccounted For. In comparing the measurement volumes at the various meters that make up the aggregate meter 2000, it was discovered that some of the measurement volumes had changed. The Entex analysis has been done for 1998 and had one adjustment for June 1998 of 14,660 additional invoiced to Entex. The 1997 analysis was done within the last month and this is when the discrepancies were found. I have done a preliminary analysis for 1996 and the only material volume appears to be in April 1996 of 8,296 additional volume needing to be invoiced to Entex. The 1996 will be completed by Mid March. I sent Ami the 1997 analysis to ask her how she wanted to address the issue of whether or not you wanted to go back to Entex. The Statute of Limitations is 4 years, so both the 1996 and 1997 adjustments would fall within this timeframe. Please contact me if there are any other questions or issues. HC
|