|
|
Enron Mail |
We need to make a decision on what to do? Should we ask Entex to bear this
cost, since this is their customer? What is our commitment to Entex on facilities to industrial customers, as I do not think it is addresses in our contract with ENA? Dan, what are your thoughts? ---------------------- Forwarded by Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT on 05/29/2000 06:13 PM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: John Towles @ ENRON 05/11/2000 07:51 AM To: William D Cosby/GCO/Enron@Enron cc: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Cherry/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Natural Gas Odorizers - Baytown feed to Entex I visited with Mr. Bruce Lilly, Foreman for the San Jacinto River Authority, yesterday to discuss the possibility of HPL leaving the 2" NGO pipeline on the wooden supports that cross the San Jacinto River Authority's fresh water canal behind the NGO plant. Mr. Lilly's response to my request was no, the River Authority will not agree to allow the wooden supports to remain under any circumstance. The River Authority believes the existing crossing is a hindrance to their operation and maintenance of the canal and they want it removed. ExxonMobil's design for the new concrete crossing allows the River Authority to operate and maintain the canal with fewer obstacles. From: Tom Shelton @ ECT 05/08/2000 02:42 PM To: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Towles/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Cherry/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Natural Gas Odorizers - Baytown feed to Entex Steve, FYI, Brad tells me that he is aware that there are quite a few outstanding issues regarding this matter, and he is pulling together the answers to everyone's questions and will send an e-mail or call a meeting when the answers are ready. From: Lee L Papayoti on 05/03/2000 10:50 AM To: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Towles/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Cherry/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Natural Gas Odorizers - Baytown feed to Entex Steve: You asked me the term of OxyChem's Natural Gas Odorizer's committment to Entex. I don't know the answer - I'll have to contact OxyChem to find out. But I'm not ready to do that yet - I don't want to stir the waters until we have more information on this line relocation. I would rather Entex contacted NGO first, once we have figured out what we will do. Does anybody know the term and nature of HPL's committment to Entex with respect to NGO? ---------------------- Forwarded by Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 10:39 AM --------------------------- Nick Cocavessis@ENRON 05/03/2000 08:51 AM To: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Towles/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Cherry/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Natural Gas Odorizers - Baytown feed to Entex Whats the load to NGO? If, as I now am finding out, it is apparently insignificant and we find that we have very few rights to claim a) compensation or b) staying where we are versus moving at our cost then maybe we just dont continue service. John is working on the ROW issues and we'll soon get more educated. Steve HPL Schneider@ECT 05/03/2000 06:38 AM To: Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Towles/OTS/Enron@ENRON cc: Nick Cocavessis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Cherry/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Natural Gas Odorizers - Baytown feed to Entex Too much missing information! For what reason is Exxon installing a new pipe support structure across the San Jacinto Water Canal? Is it in poor condition and needs to be replaced, thus mandating our need to move? Is the Water Authority requiring the move and why? Is the existing structure going to stay and is that acceptable to the Water Authority and Exxon? Will Exxon allow us to remain in the same location even though they are building a new structure? What is the condition of our pipe on the existing rack? Don't we already have a permit with the Water Authority for the existing pipeline? Is the Water Authority a City of Baytown organization and therefore falls within the City's control on franchise permits, fees, issues, etc? Once you have the answers to the above questions, then get us together so we can formulate a plan. Lee, what is the existing term of their commitment to Entex? Is Oxy OK with a short term shut down to get all this connected once in place or do they need continuing operations? Due to the time constraints on replacement, we need quick answers. Brad, you are on point to quickly pull this together. ---------------------- Forwarded by Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000 06:22 AM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: Brad Blevins 05/02/2000 05:17 PM To: Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Cocavessis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, William D Cosby/GCO/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: Natural Gas Odorizers - Baytown feed to Entex I have spoke to both Tom Shelton and Dan Hyvl about the franchise tax situation with the city of Baytown. Tom referred me to Dan. Dan said that as long as HPL does not need to get a permit from the City of Baytown to either cross a public road or to cross the San Jacinto Water Authority water canal, then we would be okay. I do not believe that any relocation will involve a new road crossing, and if it turns out that we need to get a permit from the City of Baytown to cross the water canal, then we should ask either Exxon or Entex to get that permit. If we plan to take this NGO business from Entex, then we need to work with Exxon. Exxon did offer to construct HPL's 2" line across the new bridge. If HPL is going to replace the line, then we might take Exxon up on this offer since they would have to get all the permits for this work. Those permits would, of course, need to be transferrable to the owner and operator of the pipeline, which, in the end, would be HPL. From: Lee L Papayoti on 05/02/2000 09:41 AM To: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Nick Cocavessis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Natural Gas Odorizers - Baytown feed to Entex FYI - Natural Gas Odorizers is wholly owned by OxyChem, a large industrial customer (over 100,000/d total in Texas) with several plants that HPL serves (I am the OxyChem rep). Two years ago, OxyChem tried very hard to get HPL to connect to them directly and cut out Entex, but we did not do it because of the franchise tax issue. The last OxyChem rep was fairly p.o.'d about us not connecting. So, we would score lots of points with OxyChem (as in, more business at the large volume plants) if we could connect directly to them, What's our next step? Please include me in any meetings Steve HPL Schneider 05/02/2000 07:33 AM To: Nick Cocavessis/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Natural Gas Odorizers - Baytown feed to Entex We should seriously question why HPL should pay for the relocation of the NGO line as referenced in the report attached. Entex gets the full benefit of this customer and probably should fund this project. If they won't, then maybe we should pursue this customer direct while we are in the progress of replacing the pipeline. We probably also have franchise related issues with the City of Baytown on this. Tom, please determine what course of action we need to take from a franchise perspective. Then call a meeting of the above group along with Blevins and Ducote (if appropriate). ---------------------- Forwarded by Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2000 07:23 AM --------------------------- Valerie Urbanek@ENRON 04/28/2000 01:19 PM To: Dick Danes/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Glenn Gregory/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Kuehler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Surber/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Jacob Krautsch/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Jesse Logan/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Maurice Rayburn/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Alan Van Blarcum/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Alan Locke/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Gerry Boyd/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Joe Zernicek/GCO/Enron@Enron, Don Thomas/GCO/Enron@Enron, Robert Geheb/GCO/Enron@Enron, J R Fosdick/GCO/Enron@Enron, Bac Thi Ly/GCO/Enron@Enron, Calvin Dodd/GCO/Enron@Enron, Vicente Sarmiento/GCO/Enron@Enron, Reid Hansen/GCO/Enron@Enron, Tom Fry/GCO/Enron@Enron, Eugene Peabody/GCO/Enron@Enron, Bob Camp/GCO/Enron@Enron, Rodney Rogers/GCO/Enron@Enron, William D Cosby/GCO/Enron@Enron, Ty Porche/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Jo Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lal Echterhoff/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ginger Causey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly L Carriere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Garry D Wilson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Sonneborn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert D Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, James McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Audrey Pullen/HOU/ECT@ECT, James R Haden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Cocavessis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Crump/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Barney Brasher/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Allan Weatherford/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Charlie Thompson/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Dan Pribble/OTS/Enron@ENRON, David Ayers/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Perry Roberts/GCO/Enron@ENRON, David Sinclair/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Clay Roesler/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Gallishaw/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Ron Green/Corp/Enron@Enron, Adriana Peterson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Ramirez/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Steve Alley/GCO/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: 4-28-00 Weekly
|