|
|
Enron Mail |
Travis,
Peter Keohane was the attorney who was working with PG&E to put a contract in place similar to what ENA agreed to. I have not seen any amendments proposed by PG&E, did they get omitted from my email? I am attaching the proposed amendment which I had forwarded to PG&E last year to enable them to trade on Enron Online. Please let me know if you need anything further. Travis McCullough 03/13/2001 07:25 PM To: jklauber@llgm.com, jlhuemoe@llgm.com, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Powell/CAL/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: PG&E gas sales PG&E made a proposal to John Lavorato and Bill Bradford today to secure some additional gas supplies from ENA and Enron Canada. I am faxing a copy of the presentation and relevant documents to each of you. I think that this is a deal that we are interested in looking at. John and Jim, I think the only question we will have for you immediately are the bankruptcy implications associated with the advance payments. PG&E claims there are none (of course). Dan, since you reviewed the original PG&E (Core) Master Agreement, can you review the proposed amendments to that Master? Mark -- I don't think Enron Canada is a party to the PGE Master. Can you take a look at the form ENA executed and see if there is any reason why Enron Canada couldn't execute the same form? Note that PG&E also wants to be re-established to trade on EnronOnline. I understand the only impediment to that is that the masters need to be amended to provide that Enron, not PG&E, is the confirming party, and that we were on our way to documenting those amendments when this all blew up a few months ago. Dan, can you resurrect those amendments so we can see if we can weave them into these amendments? Travis McCullough Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street EB 3893 Houston Texas 77002 Phone: (713) 853-1575 Fax: (713) 646-3490
|