Enron Mail

From:phil.demoes@enron.com
To:dan.hyvl@enron.com
Subject:Re: Southern Confirmation Letters
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 21 Jul 2000 07:18:00 -0700 (PDT)

Dan,

Is Dave's acceptable documentation language outlined below covered in the
language you have e-mailed to me? Please advise.
---------------------- Forwarded by Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron on 07/21/2000
02:13 PM ---------------------------



From: David Fairley @ ECT 07/20/2000 05:16 PM


To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed
McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Southern Confirmation Letters

Dan/Phil -- Good question. Here is my quickie response.

We will not sign a binding agreement with SOCO until we know that we have the
gas under acceptable documentation, as outlined below:

If we must deliver at Elba to satisfy a deal with SOCO, then acceptable doc's
means that (1) Enron LNG will have final doc's with El Paso, (2) ENA will
have a Master in place with Enron LNG, and (3) our TA with Enron LNG should
say that they are selling to ENA subject to ENA closing/signing a subsequent
deal with SOCO (so we can "leg into" SOCO.)

If we get alternate or secondary receipt point rights from SOCO, which means
that we do not have to deliver at Elba, but we we can deliver from Destin,
then contractually and physically it makes no difference if we are firm or
not at Elba with Enron LNG. The only problem is that we ought to be careful
representing that we are selling Elba as primary supply source with secondary
Destin, if we really are not going to get Elba finished.

Any further questions, let me know. -- David






Dan J Hyvl
07/20/2000 04:55 PM
To: Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Southern Confirmation Letters

Attached please find a red-line redraft of the Confirmation Letters. I
understand that Enron will not sign the confirmation letters with Southern
until Enron North America Corp. has finalized its arrangements with the Elba
Island Terminal entity having the gas available at the tailgate of the Elba
Island facility. Is this correct. If so, I do not need to make ENA's
contract with such entity a condition precedent to the Southern Confirmation
Letters. Please advise.