Re: weather confirm

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 11:23 AM -----

Sara Shackleton
08/07/2000 11:20 AM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: weather confirm

The attached confirm is a swap. There is no need for a rep in the confirm.
If a weather deal is structured as an option, Gordon Heaney (backed by Diane
Anderson) who confirms weather transactions, adds the weather-specific Trade
Option rep into the confirmation. The desk uses a template for options. Let
me know if you have any other questions. Sara

Tana Jones
08/07/2000 10:52 AM

To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: weather confirm

I thought this was what we were already doing. Sara, Mark, wasn't that your
understanding?

Brent Hendry@ENRON
08/07/2000 10:45 AM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: weather confirm

When the Master does not have the weather modification to the Trade Option
Exemption representation then I think we should include it in the confirm. Is
this feasible?

Tana Jones@ECT
08/07/2000 10:25 AM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: weather confirm

Tanya forwarded the attached confirm on to me. Are we supposed to have that
weather rep also in confirmations when we trade under a master?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 10:24 AM -----

Tanya Rohauer
08/07/2000 10:21 AM

To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: weather confirm

---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 10:17
AM ---------------------------

From: Diane Anderson @ ENRON 08/07/2000 10:09 AM

To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: weather confirm