![]() |
Enron Mail |
Brenda -
John Allario forwarded the Sabre comments to the NDA. I have reviewed the latest document and find changes to paragraphs 2, 7 and 12 only. If this is accurate, then my comments are as follows: 1. Paragraph 2 - deletion of residual knowledge - this deletion is unacceptable. 2. Paragraph 7 - deletion of residual knowledge - this deletion is unacceptable. 3. Paragraph 12 - deletion of arbitration - this deletion is acceptable. As to the residual knowledge concept, this is clearly a concept that Sabre contemplated would be outside of the boundaries of confidentiality. The mere fact that the disclosing party's information is contained within someone's mind should not enable it to be used to the disadvantage of the disclosing party, nor remove it from remaining confidential. The changes made by Enron on 3-20-01 should be reimplemented. If this presents a problem, please have your legal personnel contact me to further explain Sabre's position. Mark Senior Counsel, ENA Phone: 713-345-8897 Facsimile: 713-646-3940 E-Mail: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
|