|
|
Enron Mail |
Tana -
Did we finalize the TradeSpark NDA yesterday? Please let me know. Thanks. Mark Senior Counsel, ENA Phone: 713-345-8897 Facsimile: 713-646-3940 E-Mail: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com ----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001 09:06 AM ----- "Fogel, Stephen" <SFogel@cantor.com< 03/01/2001 08:39 AM To: "'Mark.Greenberg@enron.com'" <Mark.Greenberg@enron.com< cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com, Tana.Jones@enron.com, "Hayes, Robert" <RHayes@cantor.com<, "Williams, Mike" <MWilliams@tradespark.com< Subject: RE: TradeSpark NDA Thank you. My understanding is the pricipals want to meet Fri. If we can finalize today, that would ne great. -----Original Message----- From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 9:51 AM To: Fogel, Stephen Cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com; Tana.Jones@enron.com Subject: RE: TradeSpark NDA Stephen - This is acceptable. I will move forward on finalizing the NDA. Mark Senior Counsel, ENA Phone: 713-345-8897 Facsimile: 713-646-3940 E-Mail: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com "Fogel, Stephen" To: "'Mark.Greenberg@enron.com'" <SFogel@canto <Mark.Greenberg@enron.com< r.com< cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com, Tana.Jones@enron.com 02/27/2001 Subject: RE: TradeSpark NDA 12:05 PM Mark, thank you. We would request that in Paragraph 3 the "Except as otherwise provided" languge be deleted and the language below be added in replacement. "The parties acknowledge and understand that this agreement does not limit or restrict the ability of either party to engage in its respective business, nor does it limit either party's use or application of any information or knowledge acquired independently of the other without breach of this agreement in the course of such business. Is this acceptable? -----Original Message----- From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 9:55 AM To: Fogel, Stephen Cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com; Tana.Jones@enron.com Subject: RE: TradeSpark NDA Stephen - The below language is acceptable; however, I would suggest it be placed as the first sentence of Paragraph 3, if it remains TradeSpark's position that the existing first sentence of this paragraph (beginning with "Except as otherwise provided ....") is to be deleted. If the existing first sentence is to remain, the language you propose should be added as the second sentence of paragraph 3. Please confirm the above and I will move forward on finalizing the agreement. Thanks for your cooperation. Mark Senior Counsel, ENA Phone: 713-345-8897 Facsimile: 713-646-3940 E-Mail: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com "Fogel, Stephen" To: "'Mark.Greenberg@enron.com'" <SFogel@canto <Mark.Greenberg@enron.com< r.com< cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com, Tana.Jones@enron.com 02/26/2001 Subject: RE: TradeSpark NDA 05:22 PM I believe I understand your concerns - I would like to suggest that we add the following language after the first sentence of Paragraph 3 - and then execute the Agreement. -----Original Message----- From: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Greenberg@enron.com] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 4:55 PM To: Fogel, Stephen Cc: Michael.Bridges@enron.com; Tana.Jones@enron.com Subject: TradeSpark NDA Stephen - Since we keep missing each other, I wanted to drop you a note about the comments TradeSpark made to the Enron NDA. As to the comments: Paragraph 1 - The changes are acceptable. Paragraph 3 - The rationale for this deletion needs to be provided. I cannot see why this change was made or is necessary. Paragraph 5 - This deletion is unacceptable to Enron. When you get a chance, please call me to further discuss Paragraph 3. Thanks. Mark Senior Counsel, ENA Phone: 713-345-8897 Facsimile: 713-646-3940 E-Mail: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
|