|
|
Enron Mail |
Mark,
Thanks for your comments. I have forwarded your email to the lead attorney that originally reviewed the NDA last week that you had made changes to. I have asked him to call you ASAP so you two can work out the Residual Knowledge clause. I believe he is tied up this afternoon so you should hear from him in the morning. thanks Brenda Mark.Greenberg@enron.com wrote: < Brenda - < < John Allario forwarded the Sabre comments to the NDA. I have reviewed the < latest document and find changes to paragraphs 2, 7 and 12 only. If this < is accurate, then my comments are as follows: < < 1. Paragraph 2 - deletion of residual knowledge - this deletion is < unacceptable. < < 2. Paragraph 7 - deletion of residual knowledge - this deletion is < unacceptable. < < 3. Paragraph 12 - deletion of arbitration - this deletion is acceptable. < < As to the residual knowledge concept, this is clearly a concept that Sabre < contemplated would be outside of the boundaries of confidentiality. The < mere fact that the disclosing party's information is contained within < someone's mind should not enable it to be used to the disadvantage of the < disclosing party, nor remove it from remaining confidential. The changes < made by Enron on 3-20-01 should be reimplemented. If this presents a < problem, please have your legal personnel contact me to further explain < Sabre's position. < < Mark < Senior Counsel, ENA < Phone: 713-345-8897 < Facsimile: 713-646-3940 < E-Mail: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com
|