|
|
Enron Mail |
Yes, I compared their blackline below against the draft I originally sent
out, and the only changes were to the counterparty name, "or its affiliates" language, and NY from Texas, the same changes showing in the blackline below. Mark Greenberg@ENRON 02/12/2001 04:50 PM To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: 360 Networks Enron Net Works NDA Tana - Is the below the form that you forwarded? It looks different in places. Please let me know. Thanks. Mark Senior Counsel, ENA Phone: 713-345-8897 Facsimile: 713-646-3940 E-Mail: Mark.Greenberg@enron.com ----- Forwarded by Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron on 02/12/2001 04:49 PM ----- Jennifer Farac <Jennifer.Farac@360.net< 02/08/2001 01:52 PM To: "'Mark.Greenberg@enron.com'" <Mark.Greenberg@enron.com< cc: Vanessa Wittman <vanessaw@360.net< Subject: 360 Networks Enron Net Works NDA Mark, I have reviewed your standard form NDA and have noted two minor comments thereon. I have suggested the State of New York as a more neutral jurisdiction and one that is widely used in commerical transactions, rather than the State of Texas. The other comments are self explanatory. Please contact me should you have any concerns. < <<360 Networks - Enron NDA.doc<< Jennifer Farac Legal Counsel 360networks inc. Direct: 604.648.7838 Fax: 604.648.7747 Email: jfarac@360.net NOTE: This email message contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee. If you have received this email message in error, please email the sender by replying to it and then deleting it. We appreciate your assistance in correcting this error. - 360 Networks - Enron NDA.doc
|