Enron Mail

From:tana.jones@enron.com
To:david.forster@enron.com
Subject:Re: State of Incorporation
Cc:mark.taylor@enron.com
Bcc:mark.taylor@enron.com
Date:Wed, 15 Sep 1999 07:11:00 -0700 (PDT)

Our review of the counterparty list is not considering, for the most part,
state of incorporation. The biggest consideration with derivatives is the
country of incorporation (and additionally, the country(ies) in which trading
will take place). For the bulk of our swap counterparties, i.e. energy
companies, state law currently isn't an in issue on approval of swap
trading. It is more of an issues with governmentals, utilities, insurance
companies, pension funds and the like, and we do not capture that information
until we are in active neogtiation with a counterparty. With utilities, you
cannot make a general assumption that any particular state law that applies
to one utility will apply to another. Each utility need to be looked at
individually to see which state or federal law may apply to that counterparty.

The bulk of you customer list is not financial counterparties we are in
active negotiation with, so we are not capturing state of incorporation. I
know the Global Contracts Group has been trying to capture that information.
You may want to talk to Mary Gosnell.