|
|
Enron Mail |
Badri,
In the event DPC signs the contract, we would need to make it Indian tax efficient. PLease suggest the structure/clauses/information required by which we need not pay withholding taxes. If you need more info on the scope of work contemplated you can talk to Wade/Neil/Sandeep. Regards Mohan Sandeep Kohli 01/22/2001 07:11 AM To: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mohan Gurunath cc: Stinson Gibner@ECT, Vince J Kaminski@ECT, Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bonnie Nelson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lauren Haggety Subject: Re: CA for Henwood engagement Wade/Mohan, Please find below the last draft copy of the Henwood Consulting Agreement. We need to sign this asap so as to not be in violation of ENE policies. As you will see, the draft Agreement is made out with Enron in mind, even though we have left the company name blank in the agreement. Mohan - Last when we spoke (Friday), you were going to explore the tax aspects of having DPC be the signing company. Please tell us if that works. Separately, you and Wade may need to consider how DPC lenders may look upon some of the information emerging from this study, and whether you want all of it in lender domain. Based on the same you may want to decide whether this needs to be EIPL, ENE Houston, or DPC. We could also have a version where ENE Houston is signing the contract on behalf of DPC. Please let me know what you decide, and we will proceed accordingly. If you would like someone in EIPL/DPC to be signing the contract, please let me know, who the signing authority is. I suspect, that even I could sign on behalf of DPC or ENE ?? If so, I will be in Houston on Wednesday, and sign at the time. If not, you can assign someone to sign. Regards, Sandeep. ---------------------- Forwarded by Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 01/22/2001 06:59 AM --------------------------- LAUREN HAGERTY 01/20/2001 01:01 AM To: Bonnie Nelson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: CA for Henwood engagement I suspect that Enron India LLC would be the entity to use. However, is anyone from Tax involved in this? If not, we need to get someone in the loop. ____________________________ Lauren Hagerty Enron India/EBS Asia Three Allen Center, Room 2119 Houston, Texas 77002 Phone: 713-646-6529 Fax: 713-646-7549 Bonnie Nelson 01/19/2001 11:54 AM To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lauren Hagerty/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Re: CA for Henwood engagement Stinson, Please find attached a revised version of the draft Consulting Agreement with Henwood. FYI, I am attaching both a clean version and one marked toshow changes from the last draft I sent you. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments on the agreement or the most recent changes. WHat is the status of Henwood? Do you still want to engage them and what is the timeframe for their work (the dates in the draft may need to be corrected). Bruce and Lauren: please advise on which Enron entity should be the party to this Consulting Agreement. Thanks, Bonnie
|