|
|
Enron Mail |
I have some concerns regarding Vernon being able to transfer even if he is
temporarily successful with deliverables defined for him. According to Enron policy, an employee can only transfer if he is in satisfactory standing or better. This is to prevent problem employees being moved from one organization to the another. This sounds like a "work ethic" issue to me and the chances that it would continue in another department are great even if he is temporarily successful. But if Kevin Presto knows the situation and he still wants Vernon in the end, I will push for an exception as this satisfies our obligation to be forthright. Please keep me informed of Clayton's progress as time goes on so we do not get criticized for passing on a problem employee. Thanks. Sheila Vince J Kaminski 07/28/2000 08:35 AM To: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Clayton Vernon Kevin, Vasant and I talked to Clayton about his request for transfer. Clayton received a conditional approval contingent upon completion of the current project he works on. Vasant will formulate exact definition of the deliverables and we will hold Clayton to it. If he fails to deliver the request for transfer will be rejected. Anything else would be highly demoralizing to everybody. Clayton has so far produced exactly zero (no single output was delivered) though he was advertising the projects inside and outside the group as completed. I want you to be aware of it, because I have serious doubts regarding Clayton's integrity. Vince
|