Enron Mail

From:naveen.andrews@enron.com
To:tanya.tamarchenko@enron.com
Subject:Re: factor loadings for primary curves
Cc:vince.kaminski@enron.com, kirstee.hewitt@enron.com, vladimir.gorny@enron.com,wenyao.jia@enron.com
Bcc:vince.kaminski@enron.com, kirstee.hewitt@enron.com, vladimir.gorny@enron.com,wenyao.jia@enron.com
Date:Thu, 5 Oct 2000 06:49:00 -0700 (PDT)

Tanya,
I went through the comparisons for the Liquids curves and the
appearance of clear parallel shifts, etc, do begin to emerge when fewer
forward prices are used. It looks sensible. I have passed the graphs over
to the liquids people, and I have asked them to identify rough term structure
months when illiquidity begins for these curves. It might coincide with your
assumptions. I am surprised by Brent and Dubai, which should be WTI-clones.

Naveen




Tanya Tamarchenko@ECT
10/04/2000 04:35 PM
To: Naveen Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kirstee Hewitt/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: factor loadings for primary curves

Naveen & Vlady,
Jin Yu finished debugging the vatrfacs code and now it calculates factor
loadings for every "primary" curve (except power curves).
I am sending you the calculated factors:

Most of them don't look good. 60 forward prices were used in calculations for
each commodity.
I reran the code using fewer forward prices depending on the commodity
(12 prices for C3GC,MTBE,NC4,SO2,
17 prices for NXHO, 18 - for SA,
24 for C2GC, LAX_JFK,,
30 -for Condensate, Dubaicrude, Brent,,
48 for NSW, Semichem-Risi)
These results are in

Most of them look much better.
Please, review.
We will have to add a column in rms_main_curve_list to specify how many
forward prices we want to use for each commodity,
and then use the new factors in the VAR model.

Tanya.