![]() |
Enron Mail |
Mike,
The Research Group is looking at some counterintuitive results we could observe recently in the Value-at-Risk for the aggregate storage book. I think that the results the system is producing are incorrect and that we should use instead the number produced by straightforward addition of Value-at-Risk numbers for the storage book subportfolios. We are actively working with the IT to review the code and locate the source of the problem. We should also review the interactions between the spreadsheet that contains the storage book and the Value-at-Risk system database. Vince Kaminski
|