Enron Mail |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/17/99
03:17 PM --------------------------- Clayton Vernon@ENRON 12/15/99 10:42 AM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: gas prices Vince- 1. We can detect "hoarding" of pipeline capacity as an elevated basis against the actual inflow. 2. We can detect "market power" by dissociating the seller from the buyer, distinguishing between the physical "cost" in gas to run the generators and the transmission cost in dollars, i.e. the basis. 3. (As you noted) We can detect "storage" as the difference between inflow and consumption. It appears to me there are two time series needed for a straightforward model of gas prices: flow rates at interconnects (from telemetry) and spot-market prices. There is an elevated basis reflecting pipeline companies monopolizing capacity, as well as hoarding of capacity by contracts. The dynamics of gas prices reflect consumption demand changes due to changes in expectations for the weather, as well as their impact on two highly strategic behaviors: hoarding of pipeline capacity and storage of gas. We can "calibrate" the price elasticity of demands for consumption and storage, and the price elasticities of demand for transmission, as well as the extent of hoarding, from the two sets of numbers mentioned: flows and prices. What the basis trader needs to understand are the incentives, and disincentives, for storage and capacity-hoarding, in terms of the calibrated price-elasticities, and each of these are as-if exotic call options at the consumption hub. Finally, flows are "explained" by the model, and can be imputed from prices if necessary, resulting in a purely stochastic model of the basis in terms of the weather. I believe the problem is quite tractable, and I would like to proceed with a model. Clayton
|