|
|
Enron Mail |
Shirley,
11:00am CA-time is fine (1:00pm TX-time). I'll be at 650 725-5525. My cell phone number is 650 796-8163. Please call me there if plans change. Thanks, Nick Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com wrote: < < Hello Nick: < < I agree e-mail is much easier. < < There is a two-hour time difference between Calif and Texas, i.e., 1:00 pm < Texas Time - 11:00 am Calif time. < < Would tomorrow at 11:00 am Calif time be ok with you (1:00 pm Texas)? < This time is fine for Vince, Tom Gros and Stinson Gibner. < < Can they call you and if so, what number? < < Please let me know. < < Thanks! < < Shirley < 713-853-5290 < < Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu< on 03/16/2000 12:28:58 PM < < To: Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com < cc: bambos@stanford.Stanford.EDU < Subject: Re: Visit to Enron < < Shirley, < < It's easier to communcate by e-mail, since I am moving from < meeting to meeting (but I have the laptop always with me). < < Please give me a phone number that I could call tomorrow. < What is the time difference between California and your < location? I think it's 2 hours (CA-<TX) - is that right? < < I can do the conference call any time from 9-11 CA time. < Would that be OK on your side? < < Thanks, < < Nick < < Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote: < < < < Nick, < < < < We can close the loop on our commitment to support the research projects < < before your visit to Enron. < < < < My assistant, Shirley Crenshaw, will call you to set up a conference < call < < with me, Stinson Gibner, < < and Tom Gros from Enron Broadband Services to discuss all the isssues. < < Friday this week would work for < < both Tom and me. I think we need about 15 minutes. < < < < Vince < < < < P.S. Shirley, Nick's phone number is 650 796 8163 (cell), 650-725-5525 < < (office). < < < < Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu< on 03/12/2000 05:32:35 PM < < < < To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, bambos@stanford.Stanford.EDU < < cc: < < Subject: Visit to Enron < < < < Hello Vince, < < < < It was nice seeing you at Stanford and many thanks for the lunch < < we had together. I really enjoyed our discussions, both at the < < technical level and otherwise. < < < < I promised to send you an e-mail regarding possible dates for < < a visit to Enron. I delayed it for a week till my schedule was < < clearer. Let's see if we can get a match with your schedule - < < mine is rather terrible: < < < < Friday, 21st of April looks good. But April 23rd is Easter < < Sunday, so that may make it difficult for some people at Enron < < to be around. Let me know if that is the case. I am willing to < < visit then, because the week after that I am scheduled to be in < < Japan and in the previous weeks I am all committed on Fridays. < < < < Friday, 19th of May is the next possibility, but this probably < < is too far out. The main problem is that I am operating within < < a window of opportunity for attracting top students for this < < research. This window closes by the end of April, and it would be < < important for the student support funds to be in place then, so < < that I can make hard commitments to students and attract top < < talent. I am already reviewing files of students who have < < approached me for PhD advising, and I am in a mode of doing "soft < < commitments to star-level students" to get this research and its < < potential on their radar screen. Top students are highly sought < < after by advisors and I want to be an early player in this < < competition. < < < < Does my visit to Enron have to happen before we can set up the < < project and student support at Stanford? If so, doing it before the < < end of April is important for getting top people. If the visit can < < happen after we get the ball rolling, then we can schedule it in May. < < I assume there will be multiple visits both ways when the project gets < < going. Please let me know what you think. < < < < Best Regards, < < < < Nick
|