Enron Mail

From:marc.roche@enron.com
To:kevin.kindall@enron.com
Subject:Re: JCC
Cc:vince.kaminski@enron.com, stinson.gibner@enron.com, doug.leach@enron.com
Bcc:vince.kaminski@enron.com, stinson.gibner@enron.com, doug.leach@enron.com
Date:Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:06:00 -0800 (PST)

Kevin,

Thanks for the heads-up. I'm doing face-time with a customer on Wednesday,
but I'm in all day tomorrow, Thursday and Friday (I've a got a deadline to
meet this PM). When would it be convenient to meet, and could we do it early
in the morning so as to be able to conference Ansguman Srivastav (Enron
India) into the meeting?

Regards,

Marc




Kevin Kindall@ENRON
10/30/2000 10:55 AM
To: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: JCC

Good morning. I apologize for the response delay. I've gone back through
the analysis that I did back in April, and have thrown around some ideas with
Vince and Stinson. The issue may be summarized as follows.

The hedge relationship was derived using JCC and prompt Brent, and is valid
for JCC and prompt Brent. No problems here. However, it will not be valid
for points far out on the forward curve. Intuitively, this hedge
relationship will approach one as we move far out on the curve, but since
there is no data, I can not statistically determine this. One can imagine a
term structure of heding ratios that start at 0.67 and move to 1.0, so that
the back end of the curves would move together, but how fast it converges to
one is anyone's guess.

If there is a way of determining the historical JCC forward curve, then the
hedge relationships may be estimated. However, I have been unable to
determine a rigorous approach to building the JCC curve.

I can explain this far better in person, and would like to talk as soon as
possible at your convenience.
-Kevin Kindall