Enron Mail |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000
04:00 PM --------------------------- From: Doug Leach 08/17/2000 10:00 AM To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid fyi ---------------------- Forwarded by Doug Leach/HOU/ECT on 08/17/2000 09:59 AM --------------------------- Douglas S Parsons@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 08/15/2000 09:30 AM To: Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid I can appreciate and share your objective. Earlier today I sent a separate note to Vince forwarding your concerns and asking again for his assistance. I'll start there and if needed I'll contact Michael Popkin's structuring group. However, before getting too many people involved I want to see what feedback we get from Cairn after they've discussed the offers internally this week. Doug Leach@ECT 08/15/2000 08:37 AM To: Douglas S Parsons/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid I gave you several clear alternatives such as contacting Vince's structuring group, Michael Popkin's Southern Cone structuring group and a long discussion regarding the pricing and suggested "collar." I also asked if you had spoken to your customer about what they were willing to pay, but that was a non starter. Trust me, I have seen almost every bad deal Enron has entered into or attempted to enter into and I am trying to get Metgas to objectively relook at their offer to Cairn become it becomes another bad deal. Douglas S Parsons@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 08/15/2000 08:31 AM To: Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid That's fine, but don't you think I would also prefer not receiving criticism that assumes I didn't do something and provides no clear alternative. Doug Leach@ECT 08/15/2000 07:52 AM To: Douglas S Parsons/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bobby Farris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid You spoke to me once and I gave you my opinions which were contrary to your resultant offer to Cairn. Currently, I have better things to do with my time. Douglas S Parsons@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 08/15/2000 12:10 AM To: Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bobby Farris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid I talked to Vince after we hung up and his only suggestion was to call Sandeep Kohli. I spoke with Marc and yourself four times on this matter over a 3 day period and given the timing, I put forth a non-binding offer, after discussing it further with Bobby, based on the information I had that appears to position us close to our competitors offers. We haven't committed ourselves and should we be selected for negotiations there are numerous variables to affect the outcome. If you've got any suggestions for a better deal, please advise. Doug Leach@ECT 08/14/2000 07:45 AM To: Douglas S Parsons/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Marc De La Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bobby Farris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Re: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid I strongly disagree with the pricing and structure of your non-binding offer to Cairn. This reminds me of the debacle in Brazil. You should have contacted Vince Kaminski's research group as we talked about before an offer was made. This is a bad deal. Douglas S Parsons@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 08/12/2000 01:51 AM To: Doug Leach@ECT, Marc De La Roche@ECT cc: Subject: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid Doug & Marc, FYI, please let me know if you think we're totally off base. I appreciate your help. Regards, Doug ---------------------- Forwarded by Douglas S Parsons/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 08/12/2000 01:48 AM --------------------------- Douglas S Parsons 08/11/2000 06:24 AM To: Bobby Farris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: F B Virani/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ujjwal Dey/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nilesh Vaishnav/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Cairn Gas Purchase Bid Bobby, After meeting with Cairn today in Delhi, my perception is that our offer was received well. They were more open and relaxed then they were on Wed. morning and made several encouraging comments about our price range, (once we talked through the price movements), and the seriousness of our gas related activities on the West Coast of India, in light of the IOC agreement. I think the overall package is attractive to them and no serious objections were raised. We did talk to some extent about the guarantees, but we didn't get too far and they're willing to accept at this point that what's acceptable to the LNG suppliers, should be suitable for their needs. However, they would like to understand the corporate structure and assets of Enron Energy Marketing a little better and I told them I would get back to them on that point. David and Ajay were up in Hazira yesterday looking at some property for their gas treatment facility, which apparently is across the road from pipeline access. While there they went and looked at Shell's proposed LNG site after walking the last 1 km, inaccessible to their 4wd vehicle and not surprisingly found a beach. In summary, here is what we offered on a non-binding basis: Six year production plateau 85% TOP $3.67/MMBtu Net, at a base of $18/bbl Brent, with point of sale at the tail-end of the gas processing plant Floor & Cap of $15.50 - $27.00/bbl Price movement: +/- $1.00/ bbl from the $18/bbl base price (on a 3 mo. rolling average) equals +/- $0.145/MMBtu fixed on a quarterly basis Guarantees: Same protection we're providing the LNG suppliers under the Trust Retention Account I appreciate everyone's help in submitting this offer. Thanks, Doug
|