RE: general update on DPR

This was settled with Chris Abel last night. We have always reported our positions in contracts, they want to see it in BCF. We will be reporting it that way going forward.

Kam

-----Original Message-----
From: Hall, Bob M
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:40 AM
To: Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Keiser, Kam
Subject: FW: general update on DPR - ENA portion

fill me in on the issue. do they just not believe your numbers/

call me

bob

-----Original Message-----
From: Pearce, Barry
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Wilson, Shona
Cc: Abel, Chris; Hall, Bob M; McMichael Jr., Ed; Fallon, Jim
Subject: RE: general update on DPR - ENA portion

thanks

break it by location/basis point - and time - at least we will be able to see the make up of the position

b

-----Original Message-----
From: Wilson, Shona
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:04 PM
To: Fallon, Jim; Pearce, Barry
Cc: Abel, Chris; Hall, Bob M; McMichael Jr., Ed
Subject: general update on DPR - ENA portion

Dear Jim & Barry,

We are getting info from gas and power. We do have an issue with the inception to date P&L (see Chris's memo), and I'm also a bit concerned with the accuracy gas position reported to us of 5500 (short). We've discussed it with Jeff's group and they have confirmed it, but it still seems a bit big to me.

Well keep working.

Best regards

Shona Wilson
Director, Global Risk Operations
X39123