|
|
Enron Mail |
EES is fine with the Org. chart below. I understand the $6.4 million is total for both ENA & EES. Comments:
1.) Need a recommended split of the $6.4 million for ENA/EES. 2.) I understand the $6.4 million includes $0 for Outside Services. The OOC of ENA/EES needs to approve as these services are needed. 3.) The $6.4 million does include legacy real estate costs. Jim Fallon is the coordination point on our real estate costs-is this on his radar screen? 4.) We need to reconcile what we do with Steve Montovano. Because both ENA/EES want to utilize him, I might suggest leaving him in the regulatory group so that both groups can effectively utilize him. Louise/Jim- are you both OK with this? If so, Rick/Jim, I would suggest putting him in the NE Gas Box. 5.) Rick, I understand you're talking with Kean/Whalley on handling the Washington office activity in Corp. I agree. -----Original Message----- From: Steffes, James D. Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 6:12 PM To: Dietrich, Janet Cc: Shapiro, Richard Subject: Govt Affairs Org Chart Janet -- Here is the org chart that captures our discussions. I think that this org and the # of people is the lowest level that can even try to meet the combined needs of ENA and EES. Total headcount = 21. The personnel cost = $6.4 MM (total for ENA and EES). Please let me know if you have any questions. Jim
|