RE:

my order is actually future p\l based. if it wasn't in enron n.a. i would put calger way higher. ie - if it was pulp and paper and i knew that we wouldn't have the opportunity to trade size, chris would be in the top 3. Maybe 1. But in this market we need to have the people who can make over 100 MM every year. just thinking.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Sat 10/13/2001 11:58 AM
To: Lavorato, John
Cc:
Subject: RE:

I didn't get a copy of Dave's email but a few comments and I attach a compromise ordering. I added to your file schoolyard.

Our differences are:
Me - Don Miller, Joe Deffner,Chris Foster
You - Zipper, Ermis, Aucoin

I would put them all ahead of Bernie however I have no data points apart from p&l on nothing with Frank so I can't comment on him.. Not huge differences in order, apart from your slant on Canadians! The main issue with yours is Calger behind Benson and Zufferli (and even maybe Dana), he's a future leader of this organisation. Your ordering is very P&L based.

Are we supposed to cover Wes or will Causey?

I added to your file schoolyard.

Speak to you later.

Louise

Belden
Arnold
Presto
Shively
Sturm
Swerzbin
Calger
Davis, Dana
Benson
Milnthorp
Zufferli
Herndon
Motley
Davies
martin
grigsby
Tycholiz
Richter
Black
Luce
Allen
Devries
Wiggs
Duran
Storey
Arora
Zipper
Foster
Ermis or Miller
Gonzales

-----Original Message-----
From: Lavorato, John
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 9:56 AM
To: Kitchen, Louise
Subject:

I think we have 3 that are on my list and not on yours. We have big differences in order. I'm very concerned about this process. I'll send you dave's email and you might understand why.

Call me or resend me an email.

john