![]() |
Enron Mail |
I'm working it - do not worry
-----Original Message----- From: Forster, David Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:26 AM To: Kitchen, Louise Subject: Canada credit I had planned to call Per Dyrvik this morning (at Lou Eber's suggestion). Can I proceed? (Don't want to get in the middle of something you are working). Dave -----Original Message----- From: Kitchen, Louise Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:36 AM To: Milnthorp, Rob; Forster, David Subject: RE: Canadian legal entity Working Ya (as Shankman would say). It appears they will offer guarantees but I am awaiting confirmation. -----Original Message----- From: Milnthorp, Rob Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:34 AM To: Forster, David Cc: Kitchen, Louise Subject: RE: Canadian legal entity Dave, as per previous discussions, I am very concerned with Canada not using UBS AG as the contracting party. Additionally, Lou Eber has confirmed with me a number of times that UBS AG does not guarantee subsiduaries but rather UBS is " good for it". This will not work. -----Original Message----- From: Forster, David Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:20 AM To: Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Keohane, Peter; Hedstrom, Peggy Cc: Kitchen, Louise; Milnthorp, Rob; Beck, Sally; Zufferli, John Subject: Canadian legal entity The name for the Canadian entity which will enter into both Master Agreements and individual commodity transactions is: "UBS Warburg Energy (Canada) Ltd.", as confirmed by Lou Eber: UBS Chief Legal Counsel. I am working on chasing down the parental guarantee issue. Dave
|