|
|
Enron Mail |
John, I had lunch with Kevin and I'm 100% on board with the concept and the=
chance for an expanded scope for Special Assets under an Enron Corp. umbre= lla. I think I will work well with Kevin. I am sorry to leave ENA though.= I am sincere in complimenting you and Louise on the progress you are maki= ng in a short time period. As I mentioned this morning I had scheduled a Wednesday meeting to brief yo= u on a new business idea for Special Assets...Enron Executive Services. Gi= ven this change and the demands upon your schedule you may prefer not to pr= oceed with this session--although I will send you the presentation in any e= vent. There is one issue, however, that I need some guidance and perhaps = your help. Next week we will be in Spain meeting with governmental and pro= vincial development agencies exploring the feasbility of providing services= (on a fee basis) for evaluating and preparing projects for presentation to= developers and capital providers. Stature and titles tend to be important= in these international relationship introductions. In other companies bef= ore coming to Enron what I've done in these cases is set up a shell company= and assign senior officer titles to the members of that project. We sugge= sted this to legal, i.e. a shell company with no assets, who have indicated= someone would need to approve using a non-standard officer slate. Is this= something you can approve? Thanks. Dick.
|