Enron Mail |
<
< To: Ken Lay and Joe Sutton; < < First let me say that I heartily applaud the move you recently made in < regard to oil and gas exploration and production. I feel somewhat < vindicated in the position that I had previously taken with EOG management < when I suggested selling off the domestic operations and concentrating on < the foreign opportunities. My real satisfaction, however, is in the < retention by Enron Corp. of both the China and India operations. I believe < that I have expressed to both of you that the concept of an integrated gas < company was very appealing to the officials in both countries. Particularly < in China, this concept appeared to be a factor in the success of our < negotiations. < I am a bit concerned, however, by the reports I receive from some of my < friends and former colleagues in CNPC. They tell me of a degree of < unhappiness with the state of the relationship between their management and < Enron's E & P management. In their view this casts some doubts on the < feasibility of a long-term working partnership, even though they are well < pleased with the technical results achieved thus far. < I have complete faith that Enron Corp. will resolve this matter in good < time and not allow it to jeopardize, in any degree, the great potential < that Enron has in China. Nevertheless, if there is any way in which either < I or my colleague, Johnny Kopecky, can be of any assistance we stand ready < to do so. Both of us continue to have close contacts and a good rapport < with members of CNPC and SPA management. We could perhaps assist in < determining the true nature and extent of the problem, if there should < indeed be one. < Again, congratulations on what you are doing with Enron. And many thanks < for the steady increase in the valuations of my Enron stock. < < Regards, < < Lindsey LIpscomb
|