![]() |
Enron Mail |
We can take the 265k if you find that we already took the existing variances.
PL From: Cathy Sprowls 02/16/2001 10:12 AM To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Latest summary schedules Phillip, I can reclass this to synthetic storage. It looks like we may have netted the pre-existing synthetic storage valance with some other variances and taken it to the desk in the October,November time frame.... ---------------------- Forwarded by Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 10:10 AM --------------------------- Phillip M Love 02/16/2001 09:21 AM To: Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Latest summary schedules Also, in 0006 theres is a synthetic deal identified as NN4016 with NNG for $265K, this deal is in sitara 301891 under CPR Pipeline storage. The terms match and we should have no variance. Please ask Gas accounting why we do not have a variance on synthetic line - probably Jim Pond. Thanks. PL
|