Enron Mail |
Fuel cells kindle investor energy
By Beverly Goodman Redherring.com, November 27, 2000 Companies with no earnings. Market capitalizations in the billions even though revenue hovers in the tens of millions. Analyst optimism bordering on the feverish. We know -- this probably sounds all too familiar. But this time we're not talking about some pie-in-the-sky dot-com stock valuations. We're talking about companies with new technologies, tangible assets, and a clear source of future revenue. We're talking about makers of fuel cells, a highly efficient and environmentally sound means of generating electricity. And while we won't deny that the recent run-up in their stocks befits the pattern of investor enthusiasm for the latest fad, we at Red Herring expect that alternative energy will be in fashion for quite some time. Investors more interested in companies that sell dog food over the Internet can stop reading here. There's no mystery why fuel cells are an appealing source of energy: they provide more reliable and efficient power with lower emissions and noise than traditional generating sources (see Trend No. 9: Energy, December 4). Most only require the simplest of gases and throw off only water and heat as by-products, both of which are reusable. Simply put, fuel cells consist of hydrogen and oxygen, separated by a catalyst. Typically, the fuel cell is heated, causing a chemical reaction that generates electricity. Since nothing is burned, no pollutants are created. In time, proponents say, fuel cells will power everything from your cell phone to your car to the factories that manufacture them. During this era of greater environmental awareness and rising fuel prices, fuel cell technology is increasingly looking like an appealing investment. Stocks powered by fuel cell technology are up an average of 139 percent in the last 12 months. That's despite a slow recovery from the 40 percent hit they took in the spring. The Nasdaq, by comparison, has fallen 15 percent since last November. Investor interest has also prompted a recent spate of IPOs. H Power (Nasdaq: HPOW), Millennium Cell (Nasdaq: MCEL), and Proton Energy Systems (Nasdaq: PRTN) all went public within the past few months. While those IPOs may seem to coincide neatly with the rising cost of fuel, that's not the whole picture. "We're seeing a convergence of factors never seen before," says William Fogel, a power technology analyst for First Albany. "The deregulation in the utility industry has increased innovation; the transportation grid is in jeopardy thanks to an increase in electrical demand from an Internet-based economy; there's a growing need for increased reliability; and there's an increasing recognition of the environmental degradation caused by the combustion engine." Admittedly, truly widespread applications remain more than a decade away, so profits are similarly distant for fuel cell companies. But investors have proven themselves willing to invest in technologies long before they become mainstream, buying stocks that often defy traditional valuations. (Still holding JDS Uniphase (Nasdaq: JDSU)?) With early-stage fuel cell technology due out of the labs and available to individual and corporate consumers within the year, this is still the early part of the adoption (and investing) curve. CELL DIVISION The fuel cell market is generally divided into four segments: stationary, portable, residential, and automotive. Fuel cells will likely hit the large stationary market first, powering strip malls and factories, according to David Redstone, editor of the Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Investor newsletter. "We're talking about unprecedented efficiency," he says, noting that fuel cells approach 60 percent efficiency (that is, 60 percent of the potential energy in fuel entering the cell actually results in energy coming out). Fuel cells can also be coupled with turbines to get their efficiency up to 80 percent, whereas traditional combustion engines only run at 35 percent efficiency. The leading developer of these stationary cells is Fuelcell Energy (Nasdaq: FCEL) (FCE), which is poised to be the first to commercialize them in 2001. At first blush, FCE's 442 percent run-up in the last 12 months and the fact that it won't be profitable until 2006 doesn't make its $59.50 stock price and price/sales ratio of 58 seem cheap. But using a variety of metrics, including discounted cash flow, discounted 2006 net income, and discounted 2006 revenue, Lehman Brothers analyst Maureen Murphy considers FCE undervalued by 40 percent. Using a projected market value of five times estimated 2006 revenue of $1 billion, she applies a discount rate of 17.5 percent annually to arrive at a 12-month price target of $124. Portable applications for fuel cells, like generators and boat engines, are also expected to be commercialized soon. Ballard Power Systems (Nasdaq: BLDP ), with more than 370 patents issued or pending, has proven itself in nearly all fuel cell applications and has promised to bring a small fuel cell-powered generator to market in 2001. "They don't make promises they're not able to keep," says Christine Farkas, a senior specialist and director at Merrill Lynch. "They've never disappointed." Ballard has also made significant strides in the automotive market and owns 27 percent of Xcellsis, a fuel cell engine maker that is a joint venture with DaimlerChrysler (NYSE: DCX) and Ford Motor (NYSE: F). Analysts expect Ballard to continue to post losses until sometime in 2004, and its current price-to-sales ratio is a whopping 265. Still, Ballard's involvement in all aspects of fuel cell applications leads Ms. Farkas to expect the company to earn $24.22 per share by 2013 -- which works out to approximately $2.2 billion in net income. Applying a multiple of 25 to those earnings, and a 15 percent discount rate, she comes up with a projected stock price of $150 a year from today, or 93 percent above recent prices. INDUSTRY REVOLUTION Even though powering cars with fuel cells is still some years off, the notion has found allies in some unlikely industries -- the major oil and automotive sectors. Ford chairman William Clay Ford Jr. declared at the 2000 Detroit Auto Show, "Longer term, the fuel cell will end the 100-year reign of the internal combustion engine." Legislation such as California's mandate that by 2003 fully 10 percent of cars sold (an estimated 22,000) must run on alternative energy will also help speed industry and public acceptance. While not a pure-play on fuel cells, Impco Technologies is well positioned to see its fuel cell business grow along with its other alternative fuel delivery, storage, and power electronics systems. Mr. Fogel expects Impco's products to compete for 40 percent, or $5 billion of the forecasted $12.5 billion automotive fuel cell market in 2010. (Its much more down-to-earth P/S ratio of 1.6 is an added attraction for investors -- any risk involved in Impco's fuel cell development is hedged by its full involvement in the alternative fuel industry.) "They're involved with almost every aspect of General Motors's global alternative fuel production, design, and implementation efforts," Mr. Fogel says. Impco was hit particularly hard this spring, and is still, at $18, 65 percent off its March 6 high of $52. But by using a 45 multiple on projected 2006 earnings per share of $2.86 and applying a 20 percent discount, Mr. Fogel arrives at a price-to-earnings-to-growth ratio of less than one -- a conservative multiple for stocks with similar growth prospects. Mr. Fogel sees more than a 100 percent upside for the company's stock, expecting it to return to its high in the coming 12 months. Despite the industry hype and science fiction scenarios, there will inevitably be setbacks. Take, for example, Plug Power (Nasdaq: PLUG), which ran out of gas when General Electric (NYSE: GE), which owns one-third of a joint venture with Detroit Edison (NYSE: DTA) and Plug, decided to change course. Plug's trailing 12-month revenue of $13 million (giving it a price-to-sales ratio of 64) hinged on the venture, in which a fuel cell powered a house, independent of the local electrical grid. Instead, GE now wants to develop a "grid parallel" system, which would work in tandem with the existing system. That news, coupled with management woes and Nasdaq turbulence, sent Plug's share price falling 80 percent, from $140 on March 13 to $16.50 on November 24. It will take all the energy fuel cells can generate to get that stock back on track. Discuss energy trends in the new economy in the ongoing Energy Industry Moves Forward discussion forum, or check out forums, video, and events at the Discussions home page.
|