GE LM6000/Change Order #2/PSCO

Hi Chris,

Any opinion on the major component question?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/19/2000 03:39
PM ---------------------------

Scott Dieball@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/17/2000 03:44 PM
To: Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: GE LM6000/Change Order #2/PSCO

Taking a quick look at the CO I am not sure what are GE's comments. Do we
have a redline copy showing GE's comments?

I can't remember if I made this comment previously, but are the exhaust
stacks considered "major components" (or whatever the correct defined term is
under the Agreement) for purposes of delay LD's? If so, then we need to
revise the CO accordingly.

Also, do we need the defined term "Purchase Amount Increase" in Section 3(b)
in Part II?

Scott

Enron Engineering & Construction Company
From: Kathleen Clark 10/17/2000 09:21 AM

To: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Change order #2, PSCO

Scott:

FYI

Kathy
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
10/17/2000 09:20 AM ---------------------------
To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Change order #2, PSCO

Is this ok with everybody? It incorporates GE's latest comments.

Kay