Enron Mail

From:kay.mann@enron.com
To:kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
Subject:RE: GE Agreement Redline
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:08:00 -0800 (PST)

Your suggestion is probably cheaper for Enron!




"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com< on 11/13/2000 05:03:12 PM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com<
cc:

Subject: RE: GE Agreement Redline

Tell them to reverse the CompareWrite and redo (should be an easy fix).
Otherwise, we can just agree to all of GE's suggested changes and call it a
day!

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 5:44 PM
To: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com; lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge
Subject: GE Agreement Redline


Looks like they have a rats nest to figure out.

ckm
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/13/2000 04:41
PM ---------------------------


"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com< on 11/13/2000 04:13:35 PM

To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com<, "Pipitone, Paul"
<paulpipitone@akllp.com<
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com<, "Pipitone, Paul"
<paulpipitone@akllp.com<, "Cobb, Christopher" <chriscobb@akllp.com<

Subject: GE Agreement Redline

I just opened the redline that I just forwarded to you all. I
apologize, but it is still wrong. The language I added shows up as a
strike-through and ther language I deleted shows up as though added. I
am desperately atempting to get this straightened out.