|
|
Enron Mail |
Rusty,
I will get with Kathleen and we will prepare on a form. However, you will need to provide one of us with the details on a case-by-case basis, so that we (Kathleen) can generate the CA's and track them in the legal department database. If we have the following information, a CA can typically be generated on a same day basis: name, address of counterparty, including name of contact person type of deal contemplated what type of information is being provided whether both parties are providing information whether exclusivity/non-circumvention provisions are desired Thanks, Kay Rusty Stevens 02/14/2001 03:06 PM To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Healy/SF/ECT@ECT Subject: Confidentiality Agreements Kathleen / Kay: As you know, Fred and I are continuing to engage various parties in an attempt to sell the Illinois sites. Scott has asked that we use a CA that doesn't preclude States where we have sites he is trying to sell as we are collaborating with him on this effort. He also wants a document in place that can cover the sale of equipment. In talking to Fred, it appears that the Dynegy CA is the latest and greatest document that works for this task, however the PSEG deal may also work. Please forward me an electronic form that you feel is most appropriate - with blanks where all counterparty names are shown - so I can forward them to additional parties (such as FPL, Duke, Tenaska, Unicom, etc.). I would like to get this out to a couple of these parties tomorrow if possible since we are already talking to other parties and want to maximize price and likelihood of closure.
|