|
|
Enron Mail |
We need to keep in mind the 30 day deadline to provide notice. We don't want
to give them any room to wiggle. We can always send another notice later. Kay Enron North America Corp. From: Mark Dobler 07/28/2000 11:48 AM To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL Mitch/Kay - I would include reference to two (2) major issues, the one stated on the unit non-performance at varying ambient temperatures and second being excessive vibration. The rest of the letter looks fine. MSD Enron North America Corp. From: Mitch Robinson 07/28/2000 11:09 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Mark Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL Kay - Not yet. I wanted to wrap up the repairs on unit 1 first to see if we should add that to the mix. Now that Mark is back, I'd like him (vice Mike Miller) to be the signer. Mark, thoughts on the attached? Mitch Enron North America Corp. From: Kay Mann 07/28/2000 11:02 AM To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL Mitch, Has the letter gone out? Kay From: Richard B Sanders@ECT on 07/23/2000 09:24 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL If this letter has not yet gone out, we should include the kitchen sink of perceived problems. I agree that the letter should be short, but lets eliminate their argument that we did not give complete notice. Kay Mann@ENRON 07/13/2000 12:13 PM To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL Mitch, Here's a first draft. Please suggest any additional complaints/shortfalls which we need to raise. It is better to be all inclusive than leave something out. Richard, any ideas or comments? Kay
|