Re: Shaeffer redline

I checked all my emails, and I don't have any indication that I
received/reviewed this version of the document. The redline is the redline
against the last version I have on file. If the other folks sign before it
has been reviewed internally, it is possible that changes will be required.
It won't be extensive.

I will ask Karen Way to call me before making changes to drafts, or at least
advising me via email so that things will flow more smoothly.

Kay

Rusty Stevens
02/02/2001 01:32 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: Shaeffer redline

Kay,

I don't get why we're changing this document at this time. This deal has
already been signed by the landowner and Herman said it was o.k. as it
stood.
The only thing we decided to do was keep track of our renewal option since at
the time it comes up we will exceed the 5% deal.

Kay Mann
01/30/2001 01:10 PM
To: Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Shaeffer redline

I ran a redline from the last version I had electronically.

I've forwarded the current version to Herman for his review and approval.
Due to some of the changes, Enron may need some revisions as well.

Kay