Enron Mail |
_______________________________________________________________
This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. _______________________________________________________________ The "Governmental Aprroval" sections work as we discussed: Under Article 10.2, initial effectiveness is contingent on receipt of an ICC Order acceptable to each party (note-this is an ICC order "required" for the agreement to take effect). The Agreement can terminate under 15.1(e) if a "Judgment" (court order, regulatory order etc.) determines that, as a result of Hub Transactions, Peoples is subject to comprehensive regulation as a natural gas co. or loses its Hinshaw status. Under 15.2, the Agreement terminates if it is found void or illegal, or at the option of either party if found void or illegal in part with frustration of purpose. The intent of our wording in these sections, and the related definitions, is to eliminate the termination right (which was included in Peoples'intial draft) for a regulatory action, such as an ICC order which adopts an unfavorable ratemaking treatment for Hub revenues, but does not find the agreement to be illegal or void. The thought was that, after Peoples obtains an accpetable intial blessing from the ICC, the risk of some later regulatory action short of a finding of illegality should rest with Peoples during the Agreement's term.
|