|
|
Enron Mail |
fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/18/2000 08:52 AM --------------------------- "Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com< on 08/17/2000 10:16:11 AM To: "'Mann Kay'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com<, "'Keenan Jeffrey'" <Jeffrey.M.Keenan@enron.com<, "'Chapman Tom'" <tom.chapman@enron.com< cc: "'Mellencamp Lisa'" <lisa.mellencamp@enron.com<, "'Kroll Heather'" <Heather.Kroll@enron.com<, "Fine, Jonathan" <JFine@kilstock.com<, "Grigg, Mary" <mgrigg@kilstock.com< Subject: FW: NCNG and Enron site We had done a fair amount of research on the annexation issue which we have suspended in light of the attached information recently received from Bill Sherk and Steve Raper. If NCNG concedes the right to serve, the only issue is the tap. That is an NCUC jurisdictional issue, and Bill is correct that the Commission would have no sympathy if NCNG refused to work with Rocky Mount on that point. -----Original Message----- From: Grigg, Mary Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 10:26 AM To: Duncan, Allyson; Fine, Jonathan Subject: RE: NCNG and Enron site Just spoke with Bill Sherk and he confirmed, almost verbatim, Steve Raper's report. According to Bill, George Baldwin, VP of Marketing, stated that NCNG does not contest Rocky Mount's right to serve. I asked Bill to desride the location of the site---Bill says the site is less than 2 miles from Rocky Mount's incorporated limits. Rocky Mount will own the site (thus, meeting the requirement of getting all landowners to sign a petition for satellite annexation). The site is outside the area described in the service agreement with NCNG. Bill said the remaining issue with NCNG is the necessary increased pressure. Rob Shaw, NCNG, is checking with their operations to determine whether NCNG can provide the necessary pressure. Sherk's engineer states the NCNG "would not have a leg to stand on" if they state they cannot provide adequate pressure. Rocky Mount would complain to the Commission and NCNG would "look bad." Rob Shaw is supposed to report back to Sherk today and he will let us know NCNG's response immediately. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Duncan, Allyson Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 9:49 AM To: Fine, Jonathan; Grigg, Mary Subject: FW: ncng and enron site Interesting... -----Original Message----- From: Raper, Stephen [mailto:RAPER@ci.rocky-mount.nc.us] Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 8:58 AM To: 'jep rose' Cc: 'fred turnage'; 'joe durham'; Kivett, Craig; Nixon, Nancy M.; 'allyson duncan'; Sherk, Bill Subject: ncng and enron site bill sherk met w/ ncng officials yesterday. they indicated they felt the city would have the right to serve the site and hinted they would not contest. however, they said they "had to check with their operations people" to determine if their pipeline and system at that location would support/provide the needed pressure and volume for the enron plant. this may be the 'catch' we all expect. however, atleast they appear not to be readying themselves for a legal fight over service. bill will advise enron of these latest developments..
|