|
|
Enron Mail |
Kay,
I apologize for the previous email. I have been working with Wilson on the consequential damages issues with respect to the Enron contract with Clarksdale. The message I created was intended for Wilson and I accidentally sent it to you. Wilson and I hope to have a product for you this afternoon regarding the consequential damages issue. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Again, I apologize for the interruption and inconvenience. Thanks, John Brunini <<< <Kay.Mann@enron.com< 06/06/01 08:09AM <<< Wilson, We are running short on time. We are planning to sign on Tuesday, and I hesitate to put a new document in front of them at this late date. Would it be easier to work with reps/warranties? I definitely need an answer from your firm confirming (1) enforceability (2) obligation of the Cities to financially support agreement. Also, could you provide me with the Mississippi law defn of consequential damages and a couple of examples where Enron could be responsible for same under this agreement? Also, can MDEA and the Cities be liableto Enron for consequentials (absent a waiver)? Your comments to the previously forwarded draft would be greatly appreciated. Kay "Wilson Montjoy" <wmontjoy@brunini.com< on 06/05/2001 10:33:14 AM To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com< cc: Subject: Re: Clarksdale I had spoken to Rod Clement, one of our opinions guys, about having a call with you, but we hadn't gotten around to scheduling it. What is your availability this afternoon? Both Rod and I are available. <<< <Kay.Mann@enron.com< 06/05/01 06:25AM <<< Wilson, We are trying to finalize this transaction by next Tuesday, and I could really use your help. I believe you owe me a draft of an opinion letter? Also, do you have any comments to the draft agreement I sent out last week? I also need an opinion that the language in the agreement re the Cities obligation to financially support MDEA is sufficient. Thank you, Kay
|