|
|
Enron Mail |
Here's the latest version. It looks ok to me. The most substantive aspect
of it is that Calumet Power (or its affiliate) could end up the indemnity obligations under the agreement. (in other words, an entity without a lot of money to fund indemnity obligations) In my opinion this isn't important in the context of the option. Unless someone objects, I'll tell PERC that Enron is ready to go with the assignment. Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/08/2000 02:02 PM --------------------------- cindy_wasik@chicago.kirkland.com on 06/08/2000 01:59:02 PM To: vhedge@winston.com, J.nassos@pecorp.com, j.burns@pecorp.com, dtauke@winston.com, Kay.mann@enron.com cc: Subject: Option Agreement Attached please find revised blacklined versions of the Assignment of Option Agreement and Notice of Exercise of Option, incorporating changes from various parties. Please contact me with any questions regarding the enclosed. Greg Spitzer 312-861-2115 (See attached file: EXERCISE OPTION-RED2.WPD)(See attached file: ASSIGNMENT OF OPTION-RED2.WPD) ****************************************************************************** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to postmaster@kirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. ****************************************************************************** - EXERCISE OPTION-RED2.WPD - ASSIGNMENT OF OPTION-RED2.WPD
|