RE: Are we confusing scheduling services with QSE type stuff?

What about this? Is this the QSE defn? [Rorschach, Reagan] No, that would=
=20
be Qualified Scheduling Entity that has a very lengthly ERCOT definition. =
=20
This was greatly simplified to eliminate any confusion. I think it is OK a=
s=20
is.=20

=01&Scheduling Entity=018 means an entity contemplated to be recognized by =
SPP, and=20
fully qualified under SPP rules and regulations, to schedule the transmissi=
on=20
of Energy, Capacity and Ancillary Services from the Facilities.

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 07:51 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: RE: Are we confusing scheduling services with QSE type stuff?

Kay, lets couch it as below...or similar....what I did below is botchy.

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay =20
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:52 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: Are we confusing scheduling services with QSE type stuff?

(20) If and when a new RTO begins operation, seek to [Rorschach, Reagan] =
=20
comply with scheduling requirements and to satisfy [Rorschach, Reagan] suc=
h=20
rules and protocols [Rorschach, Reagan] that are created in [Rorschach,=20
Reagan] association therewith. =20