|
|
Enron Mail |
Can the gas company also make the same requests?
"Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com< on 09/12/2000 09:08:11 AM To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com<, "Duncan, Allyson" <aduncan@kilstock.com< cc: Tom.Chapman@enron.com, Heather.Kroll@enron.com, Ozzie.Pagan@enron.com, Jeffrey.Keenan@enron.com, Reagan.Rorschach@enron.com, "Fine, Jonathan" <JFine@kilstock.com< Subject: RE: CPCN proceeding - AG intervention The NC Attorney General asserts a statutory right to intervene which I think misreads the statute but which the Commission has always allowed. The AG routinely intervenes. I suspect that in this case they are interested in the possibility of bypass and the merchant plant issue. I will call Len Green today to find out. The AG can make the same discovery requests that the Public Staff makes, subject, as was the case with the Public Staff, to the execution of a confidentiality agreement. -----Original Message----- From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 10:00 AM To: aduncan@kilstock.com Cc: Tom.Chapman@enron.com; Heather.Kroll@enron.com; Ozzie.Pagan@enron.com; Jeffrey.Keenan@enron.com; Reagan.Rorschach@enron.com; jfine@kilstock.com Subject: CPCN proceeding - AG intervention Hi Allyson, What is your impression of why the NC attorney general's office has intervened in the CPCN proceeding? Is this typical? Does the AG's office (or any other intervenor) have any special rights to discover any of the confidential information we file? Thanks, Kay
|