RE: LV Co Gen

So far so good. Lets see if we can get through the day...

-----Original Message-----
From: "Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com<@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Thompson+2C+20Peter+20J+2E+22+20+3Cpthompson+40akllp+2Ec
om+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Williams, Bill; Mann, Kay; THOMAS CONSTANTINE
Cc: Rasmussen, Dale; Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: LV Co Gen

I have already incorporated Lee's comment in a new Version 7. I am just
waiting for any additional comments.

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Bill [mailto:Bill.Williams@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Mann, Kay; THOMAS CONSTANTINE
Cc: Rasmussen, Dale; Thompson, Peter J.; Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: LV Co Gen

Kay - I just checked the April 24th draft. The addition is not there
now, and it need to be. By this e mail, Tom and Peter, please
incorporate those comments.

< -----Original Message-----
< From: Mann, Kay
< Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:12 AM
< To: THOMAS CONSTANTINE
< Cc: Mann, Kay; Williams, Bill; Rasmussen, Dale; pthompson@akllp.com;
< Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
< Subject: RE: LV Co Gen
<
<
< I sent this email from GE to Dale/Bill after I received it. Since
< Peter's last draft was April 24, I'm I assume this wasn't included:
<
<
<
<
<
< Kay/Bill,
<
< Bill says he agrees and accepts our comments to the A&A.
<
< One change required to the Rev 5 document. In Exhibit B, Add item
< "27)One
< additional Human Machine Interface (HMI) per Unit (desktop PC type)"
<
< Include these changes and we can get this done tomorrow.
<
< Thanks,
<
< Lee