How about notices going to CA Development, "care of" this contact. CA
doesn't have any employees.




"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com< on 12/21/2000 12:21:05 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com<
cc: "Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com<

Subject: RE: Sweetgum/ENA

Shouldn't these be cc's under the Facility Agreement? Don't we want CA
Development to also get copies of all notices?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 1:14 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.; Cobb, Chris
Subject: Re: Sweetgum/ENA


otherwise known as CA Development I and CA Development II
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/21/2000
12:13
PM ---------------------------


"George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com< on 12/21/2000 12:00:13
PM

To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: DPedigo@INTERGEN.com

Subject: Re: Sweetgum/ENA

Notice under the Facility Agreements should be as follows:

Sweetgum Energy LP
c/o InterGen North America LP
909 Fannin, Suite 2200
Houston, Texas 77010

Attention: John Jones

Telephone: 713-374-3900
Facsimile: 713-374-3901


<<< <Kay.Mann@enron.com< 12/20/00 06:34PM <<<

For the purposes of completing the facility agreement, we need the
name/address of the contact person for invoices, etc.

Thanks,

kay