|
|
Enron Mail |
Cc: stuart.zisman@enron.com, ross.newlin@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: stuart.zisman@enron.com, ross.newlin@enron.com X-From: Kay Mann X-To: Mitch Robinson X-cc: Stuart Zisman, Ross Newlin X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf I know how to get LJM's signature. Enron North America Corp. From: Mitch Robinson 12/11/2000 08:58 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas on, et.al. Thanks again Kay. Now we need to wrap up the fun process of signatures. I hate to suggest this, but perhaps John Normand is a good starting point for EE&CC/NEPCO sigs. MItch Kay Mann 12/11/2000 08:44 AM To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES Subject: Re: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas on, et.al. Mitch, The language in the draft I sent out yesterday reflects our agreement during the conference call. They requested something along the lines of what is in the email you forwarded, but I believe they accepted the following language: SWPC agrees that the Gleason and Wheatland contracts and associated warranties may be assigned to limited liability companies owned in whole or in part by an Enron entity pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Gleason and Wheatland contracts, and that Enron will not be required to maintain an equity position in either of these companies. SWPC further acknowledges that the assignment of the contracts and the transfer of equity will not impact any warranties or other provisions of the assigned contracts. How does this sound? Kay Enron North America Corp. From: Mitch Robinson 12/11/2000 08:09 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES Subject: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas on, et.al. Kay - No way. My reading of the contract indicates that they can't withhold approval anyway. Did they bring this up in Friday's conference call? Mitch ---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 08:07 AM --------------------------- DeKrey Lynn <Lynn.DeKrey@swpc.siemens.com< on 12/08/2000 12:07:47 PM To: "Mitch Robinson (E-mail)" <Mitch.Robinson@enron.com< cc: Monahan Bill <Bill.Monahan@swpc.siemens.com<, Saugstad Kathryn <Kathryn.Saugstad@swpc.siemens.com< Subject: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas on, et.al. Mitch SWPC requests that revision below be incorporated Lynn DeKrey < -----Original Message----- < From: Saugstad Kathryn < Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 11:47 AM < To: DeKrey Lynn < Cc: Monahan Bill < Subject: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re < Gleason, et.al. < < < Lynn: < < I have compared the latest version of the settlement agreement provided by < Enron . . . . . . . . . We do want to have approval on the assignments. < Granted, SWPC will not unreasonably withhold the approval but, we need to < keep this ability. < < Thus, Paragraph 5 should read: < < SWPC agrees that the Gleason and Wheatland contracts and associated < warranties may be assigned to limited liability companies owned in whole < or in part by an Enron entity pursuant to the terms and conditions of the < Gleason and Wheatland contracts, and that SWPC's consent to such < assignments will not be unreasonably withheld. SWPC will honor warranty < claims currently outstanding or asserted in the future by the contract < assignee, assuming such assignment is in accordance with the terms and < conditions of the Gleason and Wheatland contracts. < < <
|