![]() |
Enron Mail |
I would go with Sheila's approach. I don't see a reason not to.
Kay From: Carlos Sole on 04/12/2001 05:12 PM To: kay.mann@enron.com cc: Subject: Jurisdiction issue in the consent Lender's counsel indicated to Caroline that not getting an opinion letter may be acceptable, but it needs to be confirmed. As for the consent agreement, the one pending issue is whether we will consent to jurisdiction somewhere in connection with actions involving the consent agreement. Sheila's edits to the document had venue in NY federal court but eliminated the text concerning waiver of forum non-conveniens defense. We did not present that but rather argued against it in its entirety. Lender's counsel worked on another deal in which we allegedly agreed to jurisdiction in Delaware. Need your views on how to address this issue, Kemosabe. You can do so via email or we can wait until Monday. Happy Easter and I'll be in tomorrow. Carlos Sole' Senior Counsel Enron North America Corp. 1400 Smith Street Houston, Texas 77002-7361 (713) 345-8191 (phone) 713 646-3393 (fax)
|