|
|
Enron Mail |
It's certainly an alternative. It might be prudent to hold off on the
decision until we all meet with the adjuster and see if it is necessary based upon what she tell us about her position on the claim. If we are still at an impasse and there is no open option against SWPC, then we can always have another expert of our choosing present when the next inspection takes place. -----Original Message----- From: Jacoby, Ben On Behalf Of Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 2:23 PM To: Studdert, James P. Cc: Booth, Chris; Studdert, James P.; Sole, Carlos; Mann, Kay Subject: Re: SWPC 501A5D Generator Damaged Aboard M/V INDUSTRIAL BRIDGE Do you recommend we do this? From: James P Studdert/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/18/2001 02:12 PM To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron cc: James P Studdert/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: SWPC 501A5D Generator Damaged Aboard M/V INDUSTRIAL BRIDGE A thought. As it appears that SW is insistent that the generator has been a total loss from the beginning, and that the surveyor/adjuster are not convinced of that, would you want to hire and outside expert to give an opinion? I'm sure with the help of Jim Sutherland we can come up with a panel of experts for you to pick from to make an independent exam on our behalf. Do you want me to pursue this?
|