|
|
Enron Mail |
How about notices going to CA Development, "care of" this contact. CA
doesn't have any employees. "Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com< on 12/21/2000 12:21:05 PM To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com< cc: "Cobb, Chris" <chriscobb@akllp.com< Subject: RE: Sweetgum/ENA Shouldn't these be cc's under the Facility Agreement? Don't we want CA Development to also get copies of all notices? -----Original Message----- From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com] Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 1:14 PM To: Thompson, Peter J.; Cobb, Chris Subject: Re: Sweetgum/ENA otherwise known as CA Development I and CA Development II ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/21/2000 12:13 PM --------------------------- "George Kutzschbach" <gkutzschbach@fulbright.com< on 12/21/2000 12:00:13 PM To: Kay.Mann@enron.com cc: DPedigo@INTERGEN.com Subject: Re: Sweetgum/ENA Notice under the Facility Agreements should be as follows: Sweetgum Energy LP c/o InterGen North America LP 909 Fannin, Suite 2200 Houston, Texas 77010 Attention: John Jones Telephone: 713-374-3900 Facsimile: 713-374-3901 <<< <Kay.Mann@enron.com< 12/20/00 06:34PM <<< For the purposes of completing the facility agreement, we need the name/address of the contact person for invoices, etc. Thanks, kay
|