![]() |
Enron Mail |
That sounds like the LDs on the air filter are accruing. Please confirm with
Kay. Enron North America Corp. From: Chris Booth @ ENRON 04/09/2001 09:05 AM To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: Call w/ John Schroeder Ben, The latest version of the change order for storage to Unit 1 specifically states: "Subject to Section 2.4 above, Seller shall retain risk of damage and loss under the Agreement and shall be responsible for the care, maintenance custody and control of Unit 1 while in storage. For the purpose of determination of Warranty obligations under the Agreement, the delivery of the last Major Component of Unit 1 to Seller's storage facility in undamaged condition shall be deemed completion of Unit 1 delivery to the Delivery Point. Such Unit 1 delivery date shall be used in the interpretation of Section 14.1.1 of the Agreement." Chris Ben F Jacoby@ECT 04/06/2001 02:39 PM Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT To: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Call w/ John Schroeder Chris / Kay: I talked with John today and told him about Northwestern. I basically said we were close to agreement on doing a project in Montana for the first unit, with the destination of the second undetermined at this time. I asked him not to disclose this to the rest of GE until our deal is signed. He was very positive on this. I also mentioned the air filter, and he stated that he thought the LD clock stopped when the unit was put into storage. I suggested that both GE and Enron look into this to make sure we're in agreement before we bring a partner in. He appreciated the suggestion and told me Jeff Darst would get back to me. Chris - in the meantime, could you please review the contract on this point? Thanks. Ben
|