Enron Mail |
I don't know if you gain anything - the land can be on b/s without putting
the entire project on b/s, per Herman and Mary Cilia. My guess is that we'd consolidate the other LLC anyway - so the accounting treatment of the land would not change by changing the owner of the land, I don't think. Rose -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 1:53 PM To: Bills, Lisa; Engeldorf, Roseann; Manis, Herman Cc: Jacoby, Ben Subject: LLC structure for power development Question for the team: If it appears that we may have land which may not be able to stay off balance sheet, is it preferable to have the land held by a different LLC than the project LLC, with a lease to the E-Next/OBS compliant project co? If that is the case, what about the possibility of burdening the land with some low dollar hard costs? I don't have anything in particular in mind, it is more of a theoretical question. Thanks, Kay
|