RE: LV Co Gen

It is the same.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Thompson, Peter J.
Cc: Williams, Bill; Mann, Kay; THOMAS CONSTANTINE; Rasmussen, Dale;
Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: LV Co Gen

I may be wrong, but I believe the version sent to day is the same one I
sent to Rose, Lisa et al on April 24.

Kay

"Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com< on 05/01/2001 12:40:33 PM

To: "Williams, Bill" <Bill.Williams@enron.com<, "Mann, Kay"
<Kay.Mann@enron.com<, "THOMAS CONSTANTINE" <TCONSTAN@LLGM.COM<
cc: "Rasmussen, Dale" <Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com<, "Engeldorf, Roseann"
<Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com<, "Bills, Lisa"
<Lisa.Bills@enron.com<

Subject: RE: LV Co Gen

I have already incorporated Lee's comment in a new Version 7. I am just
waiting for any additional comments.

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Bill [mailto:Bill.Williams@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:36 PM
To: Mann, Kay; THOMAS CONSTANTINE
Cc: Rasmussen, Dale; Thompson, Peter J.; Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
Subject: RE: LV Co Gen

Kay - I just checked the April 24th draft. The addition is not there
now, and it need to be. By this e mail, Tom and Peter, please
incorporate those comments.

< -----Original Message-----
< From: Mann, Kay
< Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:12 AM
< To: THOMAS CONSTANTINE
< Cc: Mann, Kay; Williams, Bill; Rasmussen, Dale;
pthompson@akllp.com;
< Engeldorf, Roseann; Bills, Lisa
< Subject: RE: LV Co Gen
<
<
< I sent this email from GE to Dale/Bill after I received it. Since
< Peter's last draft was April 24, I'm I assume this wasn't included:
<
<
<
<
<
< Kay/Bill,
<
< Bill says he agrees and accepts our comments to the A&A.
<
< One change required to the Rev 5 document. In Exhibit B, Add item
< "27)One
< additional Human Machine Interface (HMI) per Unit (desktop PC type)"
<
< Include these changes and we can get this done tomorrow.
<
< Thanks,
<
< Lee