|
|
Enron Mail |
Kay -- The comments in the attached doc relate primarily to accrual vs. MTM
accounting. They seem to be recommending repeatedly that our language covers an accrual accounting deal, and does not work for MTM accounting. Is this assumption correct, or am I missing the point? Please let me know what you think. Thanks -- David -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:03 AM To: Rorschach, Reagan; Fairley, David Subject: FW: MDEA revised draft For future reference on the long term deal. Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/30/2001 10:02 AM --------------------------- From: William Fleenor/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 09:41 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Herman Manis/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: FW: MDEA revised draft See comments therein. Please call me if you would like to discuss. Billy << File: MDEA ESMA (Mann4-19Draft) comments.doc << -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 7:12 PM To: Fleenor, William Cc: Manis, Herman Subject: MDEA revised draft Your esteemed colleague suggested I send this to you for your review. Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/25/2001 07:10 PM --------------------------- << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) << Kay Mann 04/19/2001 04:17 PM To: Reagan Rorschach/Enron@EnronXGate, David Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Ozzie Pagan/Enron@EnronXGate, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Edith Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Subject: MDEA revised draft Here's the latest, not-yet-final-but-getting-better agreement. << File: MDEA ESMA (Mann4-19Draft).doc << << File: COMPARE APRIL 19 << I may not have sent this to everyone who needs it, but I know Reagan will take care of it. Speaking of Reagan, he is generating exhibits. Kay
|