|
|
Enron Mail |
One point you were checking was the CA. Any luck?
I called pulled off track on a couple of things, but I can get back to this now. Billy Fleenor says he has some thoughts on structure from a M-to-M standpoint. Are you guys interested in having that conversation at this time? Kay From: William Keeney/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/21/2001 01:18 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: RE: NRG bullet points Kay: Any progress on drafting a letter of intent, or are you still waiting on feedback from the team? Just let me know. Thanks! Bill -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:20 AM To: Manis, Herman; Fleenor, William Cc: May, Tom; Keeney, William; Marks, David; Scheuer, Janelle Subject: Re: NRG bullet points Herman/Billy, This is still very early in the process, but some thought as to structure options for earning recognition might be worthwhile. Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/17/2001 09:17 AM --------------------------- Kay Mann 05/16/2001 12:36 PM To: William Keeney/ENRON@enronXgate cc: Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Marks/ENRON@enronXgate, Janelle Scheuer/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: Re: NRG bullet points << OLE Object: StdOleLink << I've made some revisions the Bill's document to make sure we are on the same page before I prepare the LOI. << File: NRG Term Sheet.doc << Do we want to give any sort of description of how the benchmark will be set? Do we want to mention the cancellation provisions? Thanks, Kay
|