|
|
Enron Mail |
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/06/2001 06:17
PM --------------------------- Richard Leibert@EES 02/06/2001 06:15 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Cost plus contract for Co Op City Kay, Have just received both of your e-mails. Will get involved today! L Kay Mann@ENRON 02/06/2001 04:31 PM To: Richard Leibert/HOU/EES@EES, Fred L Kelly/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Peter Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jude Rolfes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Mark Bernstein/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Cost plus contract for Co Op City As a follow up to my previous e-mail, here is the second request, which was in my opinion adequately addressed by John Schwartzenburg. I am frustrated with beginning the process over again. Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 02/06/2001 04:33 PM --------------------------- Kay Mann 02/01/2001 12:06 PM To: David Lund/ENRON@enronXgate, John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Mark Bernstein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jude Rolfes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Cost plus contract for Co Op City Gentlemen, As Dave and John know, I'm working on a deal for ENA (and with Jude) which has as one aspect a cost plus EPC contract for the construction of a power plant. We need to put together the T's and C's for a cost plus contract, and since it is possible that NEPCO might be the contractor, I wanted to use something that is acceptable to NEPCO. I will then take the laboring oar in order to get a working draft prepared for this project. As always, I'm on a short time frame, so your response would be appreciated. Thanks, Kay
|