|
|
Enron Mail |
John,
I humbly beg your forgiveness for not calling you. Now I owe you. I will check my directory to see what I have. As I recall it was part of some special scratch my back I'll scratch yours deal, although the details now escape me. Seems like there were some minor defects which could be repaired while GE stored the stuff, so we let them put the stuff in storage based on their rep things would get fixed. Kay John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 05/01/2001 04:37 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Randy Pais/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cheryl Costa/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Matthew Tezyk/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: LM6000 24 pack Storage Letter- copy please. Ben and Kay Project is Eletrobolt. ESA has had GE send the stacks for the Electrobolt LM6000 back to Braden for modifications necessary for Eletrobolt and there are a couple other changes. I need to prepare an amendment cover those changes as well a capture the in and out costs related to the Eletrobolt units. Matt T told me that Ben signed out a letter prepared by Kay addressing an agreement related to storage of the units that was different from the 24 pack base contract. Matt says he does not have the letter. I would be very helpful if I could have a copy of the letter so I understand the changes so I do not upset the prior deal. Once I have the amendment prepared in addition to the Eletrobolt team review, I would like to bounce off Ben and Kay to ensure I have not harm to other aspects of the 24 pack purchase. Thanks
|